Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Aaron Rainbolt <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Mar 2026 19:32:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.xdg.devel,gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 16:48:19 +0100 Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/2/26 08:08, Stephan Verbücheln wrote: > > When I install the Debian standard desktop, it already asks me > > whether each newly created user should have parental restrictions. > > I assume that there are APIs for the apps to follow this > > categorization. > > > > I assume KDE and others have similar options. > > > > I am aware that many existing apps do not follow this setting (yet), > > and many apps will never follow it because they do not care or do > > not really display age-relevant content to users to begin with. > > > > So what would be the required step to make this existing API > > conforming? > > > > 1. Implement the categories (13/16/18/etc.). > > 2. Hope that other jurisdictions do not choose different age > > numbers. > > Of course other countries use other age groups. E.g. for games the > relevant age groups in Germany are 0+, 6+, 12+, 16+, and 18+. > > Please, consider that computers are taken on travel and the > jurisdiction of the current location needs to be observed. > > Best regards > > Heinrich Yes, this is a good point. I had a bit of tunnel vision when writing the initial proposal, as you can see. I'm planning on drafting and submitting a somewhat more-concrete spec proposal in the near future, that will take this and other concerns into account. -- Aaron > > 3. Make default apps follow the parental controls. > > 4. Make web browsers translate the user's age class to appropriate > > HTTP headers. > > > > I do not think this is a risk for user freedom. People who do not > > have kids on their computers can completely ignore the parental > > settings. > > > > Also I do not think that the law is applying to existing operating > > system releases. Regulations like this usually apply only to > > products released after the date. By this logic, it might apply to > > Debian 14. > > > > I also do not believe that this applies do software projects > > directly. Usually, these things apply to device manufacturers who > > ship devices, e.g. Lenovo laptops sold with preinstalled Ubuntu.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQS8QsiCjFi4DcDBX+Q5rdye4jrrCAUCaad9gAAKCRA5rdye4jrr CArRAQCvlB1lhWNduAXpa243gywjKwZ0l67GUbFkrU+4rF2XIQD/SSYXGK1s60gY mLGBzz6s1GidzHqMceNBpXlbKOxUZQU= =mhOf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----