Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:26:50 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Aaron Rainbolt dijo [Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 02:48:00PM -0500]:
>Given that this is related to legal stuff, I should preface this by
>saying I am not a lawyer.
I am not commenting on the legal stuff, nor am Cc:ing seven mailing lists
of projects I'm not related to.
Only wanted to point at this short article that appeared in LWN.net:
https://lwn.net/Articles/1062779/
which links to this Reddit thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1rshc1f/i_traced_2_billion_in_nonprofit_grants_and_45/?share_id=3dwRVKl2yrkPXVurGC7fc
which, in turn, links to _many_ documents gathered from different sources,
“pointing fingers” to who are the main instigators behind this set of laws
that are being passed on different jurisdictions across the world and that
might affect us all.
I don't have a personal clear position on this, and naturally, much less
cannot I communicate any Debian-wide position. My take on this is that it
is too early (at least for _me_) to understand how this will fan out, and
where would we be supposed to place any controls; I believe all of the
texts I have read are underspecified and unclear, and we will slowly start
understanding how to comply (or not!) with it. I think there are currently
laws being approved over the world with contradicting results, and we
cannot comply with subset A without getting in breach of subset B.
Anyway, if you are so inclined — enjoy reading :-]
– Gunnar.