Bug#1135180: Bug#902981: DFSG status of fonts-font-awesome (was: Re: Bug#902981: new upstream (5.1.0))
Rob Madole <[email protected]> Tue, 19 May 2026 10:45:41 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On May 19, 2026, at 12:44=E2=80=AFAM, Julian Gilbey <[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > Hey Rob, >=20 > Thank you *so* much for this information. That's really helpful. >=20 > I don't know where that puts us now. Can we say that FontAwesome of > any version is DFSG-free, given that the original sources are not > available for any version of the font? How do we move forward? > debian-legal - your input here would be most welcome. And Rob - if > you are able to give any advice here, that would also be welcome. =20 Hey Julian, I don=E2=80=99t have any silver bullets. But I=E2=80=99m here to answer = questions and see if we can figure something out. I=E2=80=99d hate to = have Font Awesome removed just because you all didn=E2=80=99t have the = complete picture. I understand the legal tension here but we use Debian all over the place = at FA. If I can assist in finding a solution it=E2=80=99s a small way = for us to say thank you. I do think the hinge is on legal here. I can=E2=80=99t make the build = system or the source files available because we are a for-profit = commercial company. If that=E2=80=99s a deal-breaker I respect that. But = I do wonder if there=E2=80=99s some middle ground or exception? If it = can=E2=80=99t have minified files I can produce an artifact that = doesn=E2=80=99t contain this. If there has to be an uncompressed OTF = part of the package I can do that. I=E2=80=99m willing to work within = some requirements and even take some ownership of the package = maintenance. Let me ask this: are there any other products like FA where there is a = commercial entity and where the =E2=80=9Csource code=E2=80=9D (I=E2=80=99m= using this term loosely) is available for a free version of it? Has = Debian solved this for another org and we can use prior art?=20 > We > *do* want to keep FontAwesome around - it is so amazing (awesome?!) > and so ubiquitous! Yes, I really don=E2=80=99t want users of Debian or FA to suffer here. = That=E2=80=99s what compelled me to speak up on this VERY old bug. :) >=20 > Best wishes, >=20 > Julian