Re: Status of the src:lsb package (was: Debian LSB compliance)
[email protected] (Marco d'Itri) Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:04:38 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 17, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <[email protected]> wrote: > This change landed in stretch on September 14. and is de facto the > "outright giving up" of LSB support for Debian, from stretch onwards. As Is there any point in (formally?) maintaining LSB compatibility? Is there any proprietary application that does actually benefit from it in the real world? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 648 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAABCAAGBQJV+sh1AAoJECv1pcEixPekfEsMAICxexLPBCpkHb6wrvg/UFvI mrOlC5Sd7uurZ4msRf/Jclip2h8nRuaOyztWjvp7JnI3ky4floa06snlXefJ3xlP rvqSsDbXu4WHK+f5AwzbLj3/RymJN50NwTdhqu6rirErvUS2DpwSrnwjkvQU+b3b 0M/w8KXiyH1swsLFrNsPSvqxILtXaRvkVuHNlryzPv/sm8xXMJgsUjSAqBRrFg/9 SAcLMnez7pP4xBU8h11V2XgR+X9lyi+PML8oAus7viuvoVTF4hIs1UGnNhgoiMoX WDkbnad1SW57Zu6P9tlnZN1X9DzMFDE4XnxZAZKLUBnLHHn+uSpj3W6vTaEgzIT3 Y/1F1L1YduUQc5f7W0oNI3JfoZi3pMvJd31KjZsKQ40li00qEs/rUtjXEooRm+aV JTVVCCnsDIReRMWO9UJxW7sqr29g7rkp64Clk0H70fEWEl8hz4OmWlYVWxEALdxd j4bkrIaSFngbQa8oEt1XZ7C25lZyv4BF7gd20e6fWQ== =BsP3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----