Re: Status of the src:lsb package
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:11:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2015-09-23 14:21, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi Nikolaus, > > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 09.27:56 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : > > On Sep 17 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 08.46:24 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : > > >> I don't know about formal LSB compatibility, but there are several > > >> proprietary applications that require nothing but the > > >> /{lib,lib64}/ld-lsb.so* symlinks to work properly under Debian. So > > >> it would be great if they could be preserved. > > > > > > FYI, this used to be in lsb-core, and is to be found in the package > > > VCS history. > > > > > > I will not work towards this, but feel free to adopt the package and > > > upload an updated version. > > > > I'm only a DM and having to search for a fresh sponsor for every > > upload is very frustrating. Would you be generally available to > > sponsor my uploads (ideallyl until you feel comfortable to give me > > upload privileges)? > > Given that I'm (so far) convinced that _not_ providing the lsb packages > at all is the correct thing to do for Debian, I'd prefer if another DD > could sponsor any upload of src:lsb re-introducing these (and drop me > from Uploaders). > > That said, as for the technical issue at hand, iff these symlinks [0] > are useful to make Debian relevant for (some) non-free software out > there, couldn't they be handled directly by libc6 on the various > architectures ? > > src:eglibc maintainers: opinions ? I am personally not very thrilled about that idea, because I don't think the LSB compatibility should be handled at each package level, even if it looks technically easier to do that. That said if someone is motivated to provide a patch and maintain that part in the future, I guess we can accept that. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWAvlcAAoJELqceAYd3YybDM0P/0v1HioPYSEG/whWEujQi8v/ B6Loa15DRYOsfebCfKGFDMW6Whzf3/uwX4UfA7PQVy9v+msKJUdIy9nCZ06oMQrY 7KATHeHND5TEdcdXY7d/cPD9xw9gBCnjRFGovEwkcWg8B8+NsuARC+mpNWlnDdbh MsveazYeOufA/U9xnPX+KPmOEgKDK4J93Vd3eWY1uwjDwjS411Q2BIYXAkhEzAie 9CZJVw0aQeUzEcEy2oLUj8dUCwZhEEdE40aV3jaRF1J5HNFNu6ka7MBLk0fO7R2D HJn+dBGJRGXgcUVuNIajrgKp623g+RftPyWPXJz5YLXsY8UtjjHnR+cXRTB2XRiS YGnZh3zjtybSjLchfcoKDS1gwHs29qbEVodyyXNuI6ZC0sSei4KtZPlsU3Bbla0I /5EsTah7I7pI/25ROJstS3kjUpNMzfY0LwzyekrbFxM//HoDbV09ZmX1JKJdxAOB T75NoBbF0QDs0WEbUJPE6BRTUXe9Vkql923VtkE/tcwKlqPb7puV0js2a56+1dV7 gte0K7D76YL7gLrIa3tNc6+vyjrn1t8y1gQddbdyNsoVAPAJxN3HaPWiVoAJSRqO I/TYuefuGVDIKb8dDXPcoABrRRHHbIgfsic5IqI3nRTCpAFgZKmLbTf0AEt0KSuc zHthPuf4ayLIQVFcqsGQ =H4nK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----