Re: Why must LSB go? Is it no longer a priority for Debian to be open?

I, too, would like at least a minimalist lsb to remain.
>From what I can tell, that door is open, it just needs someone to step
up and maintain it.
- Dan

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Travis Hurst
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Debian is meant to be an open system. That means dropping LSB makes it
> harder for software developers to write programs for multiple distros! It
> also makes a hit on users. Like what if someone had a linux program and they
> wanted to switch to Debian? They wouldn't be happy as their programs aren't
> working. I am a loyal Debian user. Just why does LSB need to go? And why is
> this a good decision? Debian is what I'm most familiar with. I would hate to
> have to find another distro.