Re: Why must LSB go? Is it no longer a priority for Debian to be open?

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> things have moved along and LSB has not been able to keep pace, anyway;
> I have a strong suspicion (with only minor evidence so far) that distros
> built using gcc5 aren't going to play fully with any LSB version.

If LSB can't keep up, then yeah, it's hard.

In retrospect, specifying a package format may have been biting off more
than they could chew.  Focusing on just ABIs and having a small
set of dependency group names from the start might have given
them more of a chance.
- Dan