Bug#825946: Please move upstart hook to upstart package

Steve Langasek <[email protected]> Tue, 31 May 2016 14:06:54 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb
Message-ID	<20160531210654.GA21228__28466.5447813042$1464728963$gmane$org@virgil.dodds.net>

Control: close 825966

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:12:12PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 upstart
> Control: retitle -2 upstart: please adopt the LSB hook from /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb
> Control: block -1 by -2

> Le mardi, 31 mai 2016, 18.47:42 Michael Biebl a écrit :
> > Package: lsb-base
> > Version: 9.20160110
> > Severity: normal
> > File: /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb

> > please consider moving /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb to the
> > upstart package. It doesn't make sense to execute that hook for
> > systems which don't have upstart installed.

> Looks sane indeed; thanks for the report. Let's coordinate this file move
> between upstart and lsb through another bug.

There is no upstart package in Debian unstable anymore, it was removed due
to RC bugs.  So I don't see that there's any moving to be done here.

I don't recall the original rationale for including this in the lsb-base
package rather than the upstart package - concern about correctness of
behavior if upstart was no longer installed but still running as pid 1? -
but if this script should be dropped now you should just drop it.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
[email protected]                                     [email protected]

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)