Bug#858837: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base
Vincent Bernat <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:16:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E2=9D=A6 24 mars 2019 09:42 +01, Geert Stappers <[email protected]>: > What would be the harm to the Buster release > if lsb-base got NMU > with https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3D1;bug=3D888743;f= ilename=3Dinit-functions.diff;msg=3D37 ? Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern is broken, it seems to be a low-effort solution. =2D-=20 Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more deadly in the long run. -- Mark Twain --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErvI0h2bzccaJpzYAlaQv6DU1JfkFAlyXSukACgkQlaQv6DU1 Jfl9rg//XrghJN6JXjPYb5MvHo+x1Jxl2aFeMDLmAhUkIftFFSFnv0AjpGhPmS5u 01NI0k60lK2+qw9g5jOXQ6585rg0o13/aAcwcQaNPNT08EQgZbVX06m+5Z0clqAe id53pSWhFSyTu+5m+iupsY4geMEWR110rv91G+U4bZ5SUCES58MevY0y8/SZo7Yo 5Imr7t86HfWdvps1MOeijOmkm0RCQk0cGRUT1WRXq1/oUaOuCC1sYWogdR5wngDY LWbKkZv6lmFSdL2HYu9mRztvAk1Xg4kzKIPcw2lEBWh9mLCGFsOsqNCTG4uq0Kxw OdakG7CBZGPykGjZpkQbci/Kw+Nm/X/nlK8504g4Nejw86b+CyzUb03TnlprMomD raEGVu2vV1yfiNYB1fHBmtxT2Va46dGHL1jPg5K9DpYLm0dz6NMFk8KFKyUN0+vC CoCmZcFMer57I0QjMeEJ1TDctGRXIc5H1YBhbNJ6/WLWPneElyubXUJ+us5UutIM LDRXtwvuOFiFp6bm8zyaf7q64rfvyJOlXGvT4RSFcYr4ZulE0kZwm40aIQvXHDNo yX74s9Yxxj2L6u4qyrQ1onzgi8n428Ik0jdF6Gc3cDUziXAbk1jzCJlbVoMX10RG JyP6nKcieNIQVaj5R2FpMmzQzaRiY+vSI4fDkg6DhARitdKEjQo= =SLVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--