Bug#858837: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base

Vincent Bernat <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:16:25 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb
Organization Debian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 =E2=9D=A6 24 mars 2019 09:42 +01, Geert Stappers <[email protected]>:

> What would be the harm to the Buster release
> if lsb-base got NMU
> with https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3D1;bug=3D888743;f=
ilename=3Dinit-functions.diff;msg=3D37 ?

Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern
is broken, it seems to be a low-effort solution.
=2D-=20
Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more
deadly in the long run.
		-- Mark Twain

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=SLVW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--