Bug#858837: Bug#888743: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:40:33 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb
Organization Debian - The Universal OS
Message-ID <2238596.lYp4pqUr1o__48594.8063361988$1553435125$gmane$org@odyx.org>
--nextPart1567823.NB7yyTxHYY
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Le dimanche, 24 mars 2019, 09.42:12 h CET Geert Stappers a =C3=A9crit :
> What would be the harm to the Buster release
> if lsb-base got NMU
> with
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3D1;bug=3D888743;filena=
me=3Dini
> t-functions.diff;msg=3D37 ?

I have now uploaded src:lsb to experimental with Harald's patch. I'm not=20
comfortable yet to target buster, I must say, nor do I really have time to=
=20
test this extensively.

Le dimanche, 24 mars 2019, 10.16:25 h CET Vincent Bernat a =C3=A9crit :
> Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern
> is broken, it seems to be a low-effort solution.

Vincent: what scenario did you have in mind?

Cheers,
    OdyX
--nextPart1567823.NB7yyTxHYY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=n7Wt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1567823.NB7yyTxHYY--