Bug#858837: Bug#888743: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base
Vincent Bernat <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Mar 2019 22:52:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E2=9D=A6 24 mars 2019 14:40 +01, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <[email protected]>: >> Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern >> is broken, it seems to be a low-effort solution. > > Vincent: what scenario did you have in mind? For the first part, any daemon chrooting (like HAProxy, lldpd). For the second part, it's just killing by name is fragile. Supervisors or PID files should be used instead. start-stop-daemon makes it easy to get a PID file for a program not able to provide one. =2D-=20 Make it right before you make it faster. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErvI0h2bzccaJpzYAlaQv6DU1JfkFAlyX/AEACgkQlaQv6DU1 Jfl9Mw/+JIa4iJjTxA84R1wcBZC4y/y0txNWm4pIdhF6ANoVwQpr/IvyOYIR616X T2LbHJHDdp+ntbnWTMcpKUltQJl3Y9RLK+efvl/KH9q0PWsIo1Pec0DWRXI0tpKJ kd5/L3aW9qzcjXi8JNdLMyxtcqNF13QR5oTJSb+qkl3DbWMqYb5MFhVC5gZXIKrw YQnI8nIVl9z9PBr7g+IAjqiabNZgvMESfac8OHmJLKvVFC+YZaR4HYlagMshfXvY AMe1hA0iW6A4tlfTIaKOMrNodXSk+dqHWaPcfbvEoUGcRn31HpnD6Fu0gU23f42t g7ByNE9O3rwcM1LfmxkLI9435flVkXvq/IG6DB72Ja+kC70XRrV4CpD2nXvKAi+C dVeUGmyZbx2aCg71EHhDZXj7mFigmkLoX0izoMPwCA3k/DGfHQm8P7hXVHiVblOI RAWq+uQvDVwggOVHUS9rb/vXO5fTPaDYN8mFAz7dB9LoWIhd2A148iIKMjunJ4ME XxLkiKfrEU457+MXmd8QwxzXnCsDPa+Kzrxywu8xu2JyZBRkULFjjHOthrZtGXaA IEfVMYYQ4y4ktGB0rc2u9BgvZRUdKoHXxts21s/PwSphcF60YfMCpZOnsryqxw9f LNfxPNn8K/UzttJxaAcQNm75d3jF2586+/3TrJGXQkSTQ73nWa8= =1Wny -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--