Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ZK8NyMgycXbEc3u9@fusion> |
Andreas Tille, on 2023-07-12: > Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:56:30AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > Pseudo-excuses for experimental only caught an arm64 issue in > > python-bcbio-gff. Migration to biopython 1.81 should be pretty > > painless. > > Cool. Thanks a lot Not sure why this was caught only on arm64, as amd64 turned out to be affected as well when I ran rebuild tests. Anyway, this is fixed by the newer python-bcbio-gff version 0.7.0, which has the good taste of being compatible with biopython 1.80 as well. I uploaded the new python-bcbio-gff, and once python-biopython 1.80+dfsg-6 migrates to testing (tomorrow or Friday if all goes well), v1.81 can migrate to unstable and the version bump should overall be a breeze. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: Spock's Beard - Edge Of The In Between
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEj5GyJ8fW8rGUjII2eTz2fo8NEdoFAmSvDcgACgkQeTz2fo8N EdoOFQ//bIrCFEi1H5Qkh1kfeYbLrMiMagOtJYX2DIRfk96SUck8U5ZYMzWeWOSo 7XvXCFgh9cXB6f5/PKg4pD+Yy0+0d4zFpsf/PO24w7Xj1JYiWP9kMQMdw08UzXlm Cv6EH2qnfrnWaf8fRw8GEUHw3XoWKsdhozZ6gbH5wIJrvzQBxONrRyNzslm8cEQB R7DJnhL1x/lZpYIK17oSkiBh8DaTo7ErHDgjJuhRBAvEHXWfnCtiddwBax6Tm9kx kERv5AQGPoOL5DdilCge+RlMzIQDmT9lzTvySGp5E6Z6PTCqNQV21dlS3VXJ1ylK C5a0KXaGtCMqu5u7PEH4f8O3BNbRWkvtpL7qR6CKw/JenqB1VPZM9MV0u/nnrpon MXnFgNntHvQ2bEWCGCi4iXUWewZVSMauSx+6QQMN/GKiZsOWWy31IVkloXOLKbkv sGNPNU8fyZBtKBOv0R7Ann70TKKVM2K9yMip/9yVpBI7av2+uuseRhgruX72hz6C wHHytULBvb00YQOBcyJuBVwU5411/OxZqc3tvFyLDTP/R8beSbYK8mD9Pt2U8Upe GkF1AqNoVz9D1Hwe2JZLeparzBGr+0isucpSn1znBxsDwtlHx9x/LpHzThYxNHjl UXBB/MSi9AOwx8KbFNZEhlK2mqQr7kl8AUGkG96u7hgMwHLyoI0= =fuTs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----