Re: New CamiTK 5.1.0 release

Hi Emmanuel,

Sorry, it seems your questions have remained unanswered for quite some 
time. Vacations, summer, ...!

Le 28/07/2023 à 13:27, Emmanuel Promayon a écrit :
> Dear all,
> 
> CamiTK 5.1.0 was released upstream and I have updated the package on 
> salsa accordingly. It is now fully compatible with VTK9 and should 
> hopefully be able to migrate back to testing flawlessly!
> 
> I found out that VTK9 includes java by default (and it does not seem 
> possible to avoid it, although it is not required by all VTK modules). I 
> suppose that breaking vtk into more packages (or just have a vtk9-java 
> package) requires a lot of work, but that would be nice!
> 
> The inclusion of Java by default (even if not used/required by camitk at 
> all) generated a problem during the autopkgtest process. It seems that 
> the java libs are not included in the default system linker path. I had 
> to add the Java lib path to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH at the beginning of the 
> two autopkgtest scripts (test/config-test.sh and cepgenerator-test.sh):
> export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/lib/:${JAVA_HOME}/lib/server/
> 
> (btw, thanks to a lot to Pierre Gruet who had already done that in d/r, 
> it was a great inspiration!)
> 
> Does anyone know if that's the expected behavior, if I missed something 
> somewhere in the camitk dependencies, or in the packaging setup?

You're welcome, I had even forgotten about this!
I think traditional Java libraries are not expected to use the shared 
libs of java, they are there for the executables that come along the 
JRE/JDK.
But as you say, it can happen that we rely on them.

> 
> On my setup, everything seems to be ready for upload, but I did not tag 
> the master branch with the debian/5.1.0 tag, as I am not 100% sure that 
> everything is valid (as always it seems ok on my side, but I might have 
> missed something).

About this: I could not get the upstream source from the 
upstream/pristine-tar branches of the Salsa repository, and launching 
"uscan" did not allow me to grasp version 5.1.0. Do you think you could 
fix this?
I can have a look afterwards.

> 
> Can someone please have a look and tag+upload if everything seems correct?
> 
> Thank you in advance for your feedback and all your help along the way.
> 
> Best regards,
> Emmanuel
> 

Best,

-- 
Pierre

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=eZnN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----