Re: genomicsdb not migrating and new upstream version

Pierre Gruet <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Nov 2023 23:15:59 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi Andreas,

Le 27/11/2023 à 11:31, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Pierre,
> 
> I realised that you've fixed bug #1054675 (thanks for doinig so) but

You're welcome! :)

> that several architectures are failing to build[1] which I do not
> understand when looking at the build logs.  Since there was a new
> upstream version I imported this and tried to adapt the patches.
> Unfortunately the new version does not build.  I've switched on Salsa CI
> to late so we do not have build logs there but I guess you will be able
> to reproduce the failure at your site.
> 
> It would be great if you could have a look.

Yes, since I first packaged genomicsdb I have only had it build on amd64 
and mips64el, on the other architectures there are test failures. I 
tried to investigate them with gdb but have not been successful for the 
moment.

(Basically) the source package builds an Architecture: all package and 
an Architecture: any one, the former depending on the latter, and the 
transition tracker complains about this situation only for arm64 even 
though the build is failing on many other architectures. Up to now it 
has not prevented genomicsdb to migrate. This time it did... I guess it 
is reasonable to spend time on investigating the tests failures with the 
debugger, I admit I have not committed to do so up to now.

I fixed the issue with the build of version 1.5.1 which you updated, yet 
another error fills in the place and I shall look at it a bit later. It 
is pushed to Salsa.

> 
> Thanks a lot for your work on this package
> 
>         Andreas.
> 
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=genomicsdb
> 

Let's hope this can get solved quickly!

Best,

-- 
Pierre

OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)