Re: Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

On 11.12.23 08:12, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10.12.23 14:06, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>> Is this an acceptable amount of breakage or should we continue to 
>> wait? Bear in mind that if we wait too long, we may be forced into it 
>> by some transition further up the stack (e.g. a future Python or 
>> numpy) that breaks pandas 1.x.
> 
> up to the maintainers. But please wait at least until the current pandas 
> and numpy migrated to testing, e.g. that the autopkg tests of pandas and 
> numpy triggered by python3-defaults pass.

I just nmued pyrle and sorted-nearest, having dependencies on 
cython3-legacy, letting the pyranges autopkg tests fail. Once this 
succeeds, pandas should be able to migrate.