Aw: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm

Steffen Möller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <trinity-30da58c5-3474-4bd9-a90b-90be631bcf2e-1707312202936@3c-app-gmx-bap35>
Hi Andreas,
it will be best to remove it, I suggest. I do not have any personal contact to upstream, somehwat unfortunate since this looks very nice and educational, but ... unless someone enjoys such a transition, I suggest to just wait for a version 0.10.
Best,
Steffen

> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Februar 2024 um 14:02 Uhr
> Von: "Andreas Tille" <[email protected]>
> An: "Debian Med Project List" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Steffen Möller" <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm
>
> Hi again,
> 
> if there is no response of kind "Yes, please try to keep the Python
> interface of ghmm" it will be removed soon.
> 
> Kind regards
>    Andreas.
> 
> Am Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:58:34AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Hi Steffen (and two whom it might concern),
> > 
> > when Israel has written the autopkgtest for ghmm it turned
> > out that there are several issues with the Python3 interface.
> > In Matrix Nilesh raised the perfectly valid question:
> > 
> >    The py interface is living off a patch from py2to3 and is (very)
> >    broken. It needs quite a lot of patching. Maybe it's a sensible thing to
> >    evaluate if we even need it?
> > 
> > Could you please state your opinion about this?
> > 
> > We should respond in a timely manner to the atlas removal
> > effort (patch in Git) and currently it is blocked by the
> > test suite issue of the Python3 interface.
> > 
> > Kind regards
> >    Andreas.
> > 
> > -- 
> > http://fam-tille.de
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.