Re: How is autopkgtest working in Perl packages
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ZfDTK_awrdnfy2sr@fusion> |
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2024-03-12: > Cool. It would be great if we could get rid of 32bit emboss related > packages to get back all those packages in testing which were removed > now. In the particular case of bioperl-run, there are only single Architecture: all "binary" packages, so nothing to remove from archives per se. I uploaded a revision that relaxes dependencies and recommendations so builds and tests should pass on every architectures, at the cost of not testing as many things as usual outside amd64, and sacrificing some checks for the autodep8 perl recommends test. Have a good evening, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity `-
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEj5GyJ8fW8rGUjII2eTz2fo8NEdoFAmXw0yoACgkQeTz2fo8N EdqR1RAAnq8omZgDjWCuENrKuk37ZZH5hXqkGjakB5OYyRNVX/kQpa5pTYHMu2ko LeEWagMNVrMkX4yooh8E/lsR2TE80XrKrdfZgGEBR8BycR/3rHuEOvB/cSxOdBvq I1Zs1KPm2sh1JsPqcW451qLccL0GiCApamR1jdqMJCwcNFTAHWsPdVPoVPy6n5de 3ZN2SnuyRMrCV8Xo+cWDiB79p7um/2hqenFCdsv2bAXyP5iWQNRGZnD3EjKVYezA o8pdifIw5t94qAlxMBHJMstGYmDA9wLm3Tz7Kv5kAeAYmQQ4Eih49h6d0wl0JFLY zqAE2tTjODG/U/o5MToZs/Ht8c25PNhTqZ0os2C2xl+v6n8MMXXyETd6MffcF7CB Atk1hJSi3uEuvdKXwc0yrj6Y5JtKcGyfwSm+/w03ocVYImyY86DSgeVYC67tM9NW ne033ERXD8Rqx4y72oTm8HPRXUb5iyVFbuLlpu6yf5xgFGuPEEJ2UuQa/vdwtTcy xP0UG7NC+0nbBm0StAT2t73iCre8LXpQjq+Keda6Q3vzgz40gC4GuxFAtmS85zqr eu3B50zrm1VNKBssiBCbpua5NOqJfMPgsIYRJEiuhkjrtozB49rx1mqJ5todTtDf GRCc9FweQsGDZ8rz7b0Q5fzjkkcp71A9+pCOQqepfMAHdqYQWnU= =MjNo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----