Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages

Andrius Merkys <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

On 2024-03-29 06:43, Nilesh Patra wrote:> There are also packages inside 
debian med umbrella which are not necessarily related to medicine or 
bioinformatics. These include some general purpose python packages, some 
C/C++ libraries et. al. There are packages that reverse-depend on the 
same. I don't think it's a good idea to remove 32 bit support in *all* 
the packages that are under our umbrella, but probably only the ones 
that are end-user applications.
> 
> It may be good to move packages not related to medicine to different teams over time but some of them actually don't fit into any availability team as per my understanding and may have to be moved to debian/ namespace.

I think Nilesh raises very important points. Personally I see no problem 
in leaving arch:any in debian/control and from time to time RMing the 
failing architectures.

Best wishes,
Andrius
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.