If someone might care for raxml-ng this would be great (Was: [amkozlov/raxml-ng] What libpll code is really needed (Issue #164))

Andreas Tille <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I never managed to finish raxml-ng packaging which would be a great
thing to have.  Some hints about its preconditions can be found
inn the issue linked below.

Kind regards
   Andreas.

----- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von Alexey Kozlov <[email protected]> -----

Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:17:07 -0700
From: Alexey Kozlov <[email protected]>
To: amkozlov/raxml-ng <[email protected]>
Cc: Andreas Tille <[email protected]>, Author <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [amkozlov/raxml-ng] What libpll code is really needed (Issue #164)

> If I simply would package libpll-2 in the very place where libpll was packaged and I keep *that* name (without the -2) this would be pretty convenient since its not a new Debian package and does not need any new processing. Do you think this is the correct way to go?

Yes, I think this is the way to go.

In fact, in the next major raxml-ng release, both `libpll-2` and `pll-modules` will be superseded by the new lib `coraxlib`:

https://codeberg.org/Exelixis-Lab/coraxlib

This should hopefully solve the long-lasting historical name confusion.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-ng/issues/164#issuecomment-1684443628
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Message ID: <amkozlov/raxml-ng/issues/164/[email protected]>

----- Ende weitergeleitete Nachricht -----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.