Re: GNUmed (-client/-server): new upstream available

Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear Étienne,

thanks for looking into this.

> Thanks, it looks like there are no changes too involved.  I saw
> in the gnumed packages extensive logic to deal with various
> issues and dispatch files in several locations and documentation
> packages, but it seems most of the heavy lifting is already
> done.

It should be. Andreas had been packaging GNUmed for the last
ten years or so. Off the top of my head I don't recall
changes that would ask for a change in packaging
infrastructure, this being a maintenance release.

> > 	https://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/1.8/
>
> I could get gnumed-client 1.8.19, no problem so far.
>
> > 	https://www.gnumed.de/downloads/server/v22
>
> I'm a bit confused by the gnumed-server 22.28 refresh I see on
> your web page.  Is the 22.28 source code from January already in
> sid sufficient, or are there substancial changes?
>
> (I'm just checking I'm not assuming wrongly.  With #1082672 and
> the changelog only covering gnumed-client, I'd suppose only the
> client is needed.  But if not, a server version bump to 22.29
> would have been less confusing and would have had a chance to be
> caught by our uscan tool.)

I should have been more precise.

1) yes, the existing 22.28 gnumed-server package _should_
   suffice because there are no semantic changes

2) however, there might be code cleanup in gnumed-common code
   which would also "affect" the -server package

3) yes it would have been less ambigous to bump the version

Theoretically, only the client is needed.

I'll upload 22.29 for good measure ;-)

Nevertheless, for the record: any 1.8.19 client will work
just fine with a 22.28 database, old or new...

Thanks,
Karsten
--
GPG  40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6  5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.