python-biopython test failure with libcifpp changes (Bug #1086156)

Hi Maarten,

I'm dealing with python-biopython release critical bug #1086156,
and I was wondering whether the 422M dataset components.cif
wouldn't be worth injecting into the libcifpp-data package, to
facilitate the handling of data by end users?  I guess that sure
would make the package rather large, so I can understand if this
is deemed excessive; although I believe some Debian packages do
happen to be a little larger, although I don't really have
specific examples in mind.

https://bugs.debian.org/1086156

If there are blockers, then another option for me might be to
skip the test, as internet access at build time is not an
option, but it means missing out on other genuine issues
affecting libcifpp support in python-biopython.  The thing is,
I'm not sure yet whether the test failure results from issues in
python-biopython or libcifpp-data.

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity
   `-    on air: Kaipa - In A World Of Pines

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dmrQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----