Re: help needed

Hi Maarten,

About this issue:
> Oh, and piuparts complains about something. Perhaps one with more knowledge
> is willing to have a look at salsa to see what is wrong here?
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libpdb-redo

The relevant message in piuparts' output would be:
>> Unpacking libpdb-redo3.2 (3.2.1-2+salsaci+20250129+24) ...
>> dpkg: error processing archive /var/lib/local-apt-repository/../../..//srv/local-apt-repository/libpdb-redo3.2_3.2.1-2+salsaci+20250129+24_amd64.deb (--unpack):
>>  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpdb-redo.so.3.2.1', which is also in package libpdb-redo3 (3.2.1-1)

This is probably because libpdb-redo3.2 breaks and replaces
libpdb-redo3 but does not declare it in its control file,
causing dpkg to flag the conflict on the file
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpdb-redo.so.3.2.1 upon upgrade.

In hope this helps,
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity
   `-

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=yKnT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----