New bali-phy version 4.0

Benjamin Redelings <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Etienne,

Thanks for packaging bali-phy version 4.0-beta16 in experimental.

I've uploaded bali-phy 4.0 to github now.  Would it be possible to 
package version 4.0 for unstable?

-BenRI

On 11/23/24 3:35 PM, Benjamin Redelings wrote:
> Hi Etienne,
>
> I've uploaded a new version: 4.0-beta16.  It should address the errors 
> that were found.  The errors only occurred when running multiple 
> instances of bali-phy at once immediately after installing a new 
> version, which rarely occurred except when running tests with ninja.  
> I've added a few layers of safeguards around reading/writing cached 
> data structures to prevent this from happening again.
>
> I've added `ninja test` to the CI, in addition to the non-ninja test 
> harness, to prevent surprises like this in the future.
>
> If you can try packaging 4.0-beta16 that would be great.  There 
> shouldn't be any errors, but if any occur, I'll try to make a beta17 
> relatively quickly.
>
> -BenRI
>
> On 7/10/24 9:02 AM, Étienne Mollier wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Étienne Mollier, on 2024-07-10:
>>> Full log would probably be better suited in your issue tracker
>>> than in a mailing list.  Let me know if you need it.  I tried to
>>> trip Salsa CI so it produces an independent build and a build
>>> log to point to, but it doesn't look to be operating right now.
>> Actually, the CI kicked in and reported a different set of test
>> failures[1].  I'm not sure what's up.  Does this ring a bell?
>>
>> [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/bali-phy/-/jobs/5952519
>>
>> Have a nice day,  :)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.