Re: Request for review:added autopkgtest for king

Pierre Gruet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Harish,

Le 01/06/2025 à 13:21, harish chavre a écrit :
> Hi Pierre ,
> 
> Thank you for reviewing the autopkgtest I added for the king package.

You're welcome :)

> 
> Regarding the suggestion to replace the command |java -jar /usr/share/ 
> java/king.jar | with |/usr/bin/king|, I checked the situation. The |/ 
> usr/bin/king|    path is currently just a symlink to |/usr/share/java/ 
> king.jar|.  Since this is a Java Archive  file and not an executable, it 
> cannot be run directly. Trying to execute |/usr/bin/king|  gives an 
> error that says it could not find an interpreter, because there is no 
> wrapper script or binary to handle it.

You're right, this is wrong and I opened bug #1107114 about this, with 
the suggestion of a fix. If you are comfortable with it, it would be 
welcome to have you address it :)

Then you may invoke just ``king'' in your autopkgtest.

> 
> Regarding the restriction marked as "superficial," I understand that 
> removing it would allow for a more complete test. However, king is a 
> graphical application that requires X11 to work, and running the test 
> without a virtual display setup causes errors because it tries to open a 
> window. In my setup, I am running the test inside a schroot environment, 
> which does not provide display authorization, so the test cannot access 
> the X11 display.
> 
> Could you please suggest how I should proceed?

I perfectly understand. My concern is that your test is, still, 
powerful, and having only a superficial test would not result in a 
migrating bounty. Sure, this is still better than having no test.

I suggest you consider whether your test covers a significant part of 
the functionality of king. ``a significant part'' is not ``everything''.
If you think it does, then the superficial restriction may be removed. 
Else keep it and this is still good to have :)

> 
> I will verify the license of example.kin and update debian/copyright 
> accordingly.

Thanks for this, and for all the work also.

> 
> Regards,
> Harish
> Cheers,

-- 
Pierre
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=92kv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.