Re: libcifpp update

"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:36:24 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Andrius,

Op 08-09-2025 om 09:15 schreef Andrius Merkys:
>> I just uploaded a new version of libcifpp (version 9) to salsa. Could 
>> someone with more powers than me please upload this to the NEW queue?
>
> The shared library package of libcifpp changes soversion in this 
> upload. Maybe it should target experimental instead of unstable and 
> undergo a transition? It seems that his have been the case for 
> libcifpp 5.0.3-1 upload.

Ah, yes, I forgot to specify experimental. But it was my intention, 
that's why I mention the NEW queue.

>> BTW, I decided to keep the old components.cif file in the data part 
>> of libcifpp even though I considered splitting out the file into 
>> separate files. After profiling I found that this adds at most 0.7 
>> seconds to a run that needs component information and I thought it 
>> was not worth the trouble to re-implement this. If others do think 
>> this is still worth it, I will reconsider.
>
> OK, noted. This means the reverse dependencies do not have to change 
> at all, right?

Theoretically, you're correct. I really, hope so.

regards, -maarten