Bug#1132309: RFS: linmon/0.1.3-1 [ITP] -- terminal monitor for Linux CPU, RAM, swap and NVIDIA GPU

Simon Quigley <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:04:11 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors
Message-ID <E5163585-4CB1-47BD-AE83-CEDFBF242B64__34477.9659806349$1784074061$gmane$org@tsimonq2.net>
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo

Hello,

When trying to build your package, I get the following:

$ uscan --download-current-version 
Newest version of linmon on remote site is 0.1.3, specified download version is 0.1.3
Successfully symlinked ../linmon-0.1.3.tar.gz to ../linmon_0.1.3.orig.tar.gz.
$ <my irrelevant build command>
dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
dpkg-source: info: building linmon using existing ../linmon_0.1.3.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0775 of 'scripts/build-debian-source.sh' will not be represented in diff
dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
 .github/workflows/pages.yml
 .github/workflows/release.yml
 Cargo.lock
 Cargo.toml
 DEVELOPMENT.md
 README.md
 scripts/build-apt-repo.sh
 scripts/build-debian-source.sh
 scripts/package-deb.sh
 src/config.rs
 src/sources.rs
dpkg-source: hint: make sure the version in debian/changelog matches the unpacked source tree
dpkg-source: hint: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source --commit
dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see /tmp/linmon_0.1.3-2.diff.BEZMlk

Please either remove those files, or sync them with what is in the tarball.

From a manual check, here are some notes:
 - Please upgrade the watch file to version 5.
 - The tests are marked as superficial, is that intentional?
 - Please update to Standards-Version 4.7.4, dropping Priority: optional and Rules-Requires-Root: no from control.
 - Please consider upgrading to debhelper-compat 14.
 - Please limit debian/changelog to one entry for your initial upload.

It otherwise looks okay on an initial, manual pass. Please remove the moreinfo tag once you are ready for review again. Feel free to CC me, if I'm available I can review again.

Best regards,
Simon Quigley
[email protected]