Bug#1128084: ffmpeg: Enable whisper support using whisper.cpp?

Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.multimedia
Message-ID <178688562867.2845312.8031215017225817283__6937.38365532539$1786885768$gmane$org@cairon.jones.dk>
Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2026-08-16 14:56:31)
> Hi Jonas
> 
> On 2026-08-16 14:10:06 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> > 
> > Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2026-08-16 13:40:26)
> > > On 2026-04-26 18:17:33 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > > Not at the moment. whisper.cpp and its (build-)dependencies are not
> > > > > in testing and looking at their current state they are not ready to
> > > > > be promoted to key packages.
> > > > 
> > > > whisper.cpp migrated to testing 2 weeks ago.
> > > > 
> > > > Please reconsider enabling support for it here.
> > > 
> > > It does not look like whipser.cpp and its (transitive) dependencies are
> > > ready to become key packages:
> > > 
> > >  Marked for autoremoval on 05 September due to aardvark-dns, golang-github-bmizerany-assert, golang-github-masterminds-sprig, httpcore, jupyter-notebook, node-playwright, node-yarnpkg, towncrier, wasmedge: #1133663, #1135849, #1138720, #1141793, #1143319, #1143321, #1143428, #1143887, #1143916, #1143952
> > 
> > I don't think looking at "risk of problems if no action for more than a
> > month" is sensible. I suspect ffmpeg would not fit that bar - but as I
> > understand it we may never know that, because autoremovals are computed
> > only for non-key packages.
> 
> Well, we do know and I have removed problematic dependencies from ffmpeg
> to get them out of the key packages set in the past.
> 
> > Put another way: What do ffmpeg maintainers consider the threshold for
> > acceptance, if neither "has stayed in testing for 2 week" nor "has
> > stayed testing for 4 months"?
> 
> As we (as in the release team) are trying to reduce the size of the
> key package set, I am not willingly adding new packages to that set that
> have RC bugs open and unanswered for 4 months.

Oh! I was unaware that this issue involves RC bugs ignored for 4 months
and agree that is a sensible bar to set. Which bugs is it?

Kind regards,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bAyK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.