Bug#1128084: ffmpeg: Enable whisper support using whisper.cpp?
Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.multimedia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <178688562867.2845312.8031215017225817283__6937.38365532539$1786885768$gmane$org@cairon.jones.dk> |
Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2026-08-16 14:56:31) > Hi Jonas > > On 2026-08-16 14:10:06 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2026-08-16 13:40:26) > > > On 2026-04-26 18:17:33 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > > Not at the moment. whisper.cpp and its (build-)dependencies are not > > > > > in testing and looking at their current state they are not ready to > > > > > be promoted to key packages. > > > > > > > > whisper.cpp migrated to testing 2 weeks ago. > > > > > > > > Please reconsider enabling support for it here. > > > > > > It does not look like whipser.cpp and its (transitive) dependencies are > > > ready to become key packages: > > > > > > Marked for autoremoval on 05 September due to aardvark-dns, golang-github-bmizerany-assert, golang-github-masterminds-sprig, httpcore, jupyter-notebook, node-playwright, node-yarnpkg, towncrier, wasmedge: #1133663, #1135849, #1138720, #1141793, #1143319, #1143321, #1143428, #1143887, #1143916, #1143952 > > > > I don't think looking at "risk of problems if no action for more than a > > month" is sensible. I suspect ffmpeg would not fit that bar - but as I > > understand it we may never know that, because autoremovals are computed > > only for non-key packages. > > Well, we do know and I have removed problematic dependencies from ffmpeg > to get them out of the key packages set in the past. > > > Put another way: What do ffmpeg maintainers consider the threshold for > > acceptance, if neither "has stayed in testing for 2 week" nor "has > > stayed testing for 4 months"? > > As we (as in the release team) are trying to reduce the size of the > key package set, I am not willingly adding new packages to that set that > have RC bugs open and unanswered for 4 months. Oh! I was unaware that this issue involves RC bugs ignored for 4 months and agree that is a sensible bar to set. Which bugs is it? Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAmqBtfoACgkQLHwxRsGg ASH5VBAAkWc2FbVZU3Yf0KHVtfykrv05p2z22fHFNNFysDtnAC+B6tn88wEUI+S0 WeS4DTzXA+waA9Si0w9s5n56bYrPBgTSMLhGWCiVh19Mbq/Wx9i0o4+M0pXH5yBo SeDBgMMXYAhED7mpxYKekHGzyQLw9vOuq8CA6LxE/ISCFLfv6O+VG3bwxOuGsxKQ lV7OS6hJ7h1nT71wgbevNOAEJ3YOjtCoo3csyAUSYOS9v1O0LJFDr6muSgmszSyT YRhaD8UwYjHNDatRhqKTeatHM4i4OlTkd1GCla1570mr6A85S3UtPF2YDOdVxrTf 6Sq6CDjo51Jql/NoL0xKmUPar8B5b6NJs2Uk0wEDmF3r9PQOrikTcMamyl4EV+RF NWsyBkY3rsV3rqbTFdwhowW1luWkwCSOiPF9J4McXNTgO7GN0MZpPa5KsMsG7Pki RaaYheORW29jQaidgOUfDATHH70pJQ7yazGjLBXZ0fVpUeLtipOBhnxkV94l1yYc MdfHGZJI42b3Rvp3IUvSuKhiVZW6EI2LUqlC6Wfq7WcL3ELketygr9WSnveiARZw XmozrPnJ59aysSn1dAO/s8BAgAGIjDPnUmX+dioD3bRUlkpm+wgNzPynMOD+IbOa YtrLFQiaKe51iaQom80JxuXCWL1EyiE/x+q51Ez+4BKvHwvf5ko= =bAyK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----