Re: Endorsing Luke Yasuda's key 4E098D1900AA3F721899261409B3316E13A11EFC
Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.new-maintainer |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Ying-Chun! Ying-Chun Liu (via nm.debian.org) dijo [Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 06:06:25PM -0000]: > > I met Luke Yasuda in DebConf26 in Argentina. We have a good > conversation on bazel and mozc related stuff. > > (...) > > I've signed Luke Yasuda's key and checked the ID of Luke Yasuda. All > looks good to me. And I'm using caff to send Luke Yasuda the > encrypted mail for the signature. I've made sure that they are able > to decrypt encrypted messages sent to this key and that they're able > to sign messages with the same key. > > Due to the interactions we had, I'm convinced that Luke Yasuda as > they present themselves on nm.debian.org is the rightful owner of > both email [email protected] and GPG key 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 > 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC. FWIW, I can (as everybody else) verify Luke's key has been recently signed with your key 0x44173fa13d058888: https://pgpkeys.eu/pks/lookup?search=luke+yasuda&fingerprint=on&op=index So, I'm a bit baffled here: what is the reason for endorisng Luke's key, if it is already certified by yours? Key endorsements were created as a (slightly?) lower verification tier than key signatures. As keyring-maint, I see no added value in submitting an endorsement in this condition. Greetings!