Re: Java/J2EE and the future..
Chris <dev-YbxNZ/[email protected]> Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:28:56 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.nonprofit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 7:55, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Jonas didn't run last time around I tried because of CAROL's > dependency on some undocumented sun.* API. OpenEJB breaks quite > early since it's developers decided that they needed to use > reflection on the precise names on internal fields of Sun's > implementation to access information that wasn't exposed through > some API. When you implement something in a clean-room fashion, > chances are you won't be able to guess the unspecified bits right. > The problem with most of the free J2EE implementations I tried was > that they have dependencies on the 'unspecified bits'. So a few > volunteers that could help out with identifying those bits, and > finding workarounds would be most welcome. Some experience using > the free J2EE solutions would be a plus [1] :) Are you currently aware of any issues with JBoss that would hamper its ability to run on a "pure" Java 1.4 runtime? I'm trying to figure out which J2EE app server would be best to target.. > [1] Yeah, I know I sound like a HR ad for free java, but hey, if > you want GNU Classpath to become a useable platform for your field > of endeavour, you need to donate a little bit of your time and > knowledge to make it get there (sooner). I certainly would right away if I could. I'm actually quite new to Java myself, let alone J2EE. But once I get everything figured out, I will certainly do what I can. Incidentally, thanks for the insightful email. Chris