Re: Debian NEW review note for libreoffice-dictionaries 1:26.2.2-1
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Apr 2026 02:56:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.openoffice |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Am 19.04.26 um 01:31 schrieb [email protected]: > The only real remaining problem is the mess of licenses. The GPL and GPL-2 seemingly conflicting with the Apache, and the questions about CC-BY-SA versions and whether Well, all of those are independent works. Not even maintained inside LibreOffice in most cases and just put and mirrored and distributed together inside LibreOffices dictionaries/ module. It's no problem is one dictionary has a a incompatible license to the other ones as they are just shipped alongside. As does Debian with package A being GPL and another totally random package having a conflicting license.. > GFDL-1.1+ means GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later or GFDL-1.1-invariants-or-later. Presumably the first, but I think it should be explicitly called out in debian/copyright. Well, if it was invariants it would have been non-free anyway. AFAICS if nothing is specified as invariant section (which isn't here for the cs_CZ and gug stuff) there is no invariant sections. But maybe making it explicit makes sense... Regards, Rene