Re: Glycin vs. AppArmor: fix available in sid
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Jun 2026 17:49:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.openoffice |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Am 01.06.26 um 16:36 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: >> To do so, ensure the app's profile has this line: >> >> include if exists <abstractions/glycin> > The issue is that, if you really mean the app and not the software > that uses Glycin, LibreOffice does *not* use Glycin directly, and > I suppose that it does not even know that Glycin will be used: Exactly. > here, Glycin is used via the GDK Pixbuf library (a.k.a. gdk-pixbuf). > And perhaps gdk-pixbuf may no longer use Glycin in the future. So it > would be strange if the libreoffice package had to add this line. I would not be opposed to it though if it made the "issue" disappear. But it's indeed not ideal. > > So, how should the above line be added? Some kind of double > inclusion (the app's profile → gdk-pixbuf → abstractions/glycin)? > Or some automatic way for Glycin to add such a line to the profiles > of the apps via some kind of mechanism? Or it being in LibreOffices profile automatically makes it work even though there's no usage except for using gdk-pixbuf? No idea. Regards, Rene >