Re: RFS: libobject-result-perl

Hi,

I'm using the occasion of the local BSP for *finally* moving this forward.

I'm aware that we're currently in the soft freeze so I have probably 
missed my chance of getting this library in the archive for bookworm.. 
but at least if the fixes seem good for folks in the team, I can assume 
that it's done and wait after the release to ask for sponsoring.

I've changed the license file as suggested. I couldn't find the typo 
that's mentioned below - lintian on my end seems happy - and I don't 
remember if I had already fixed it before.

Does the result in the salsa repository look good enough for an eventual 
new package in the archive?
If so, as mentioned above, I'll wait for the appropriate time to request 
help with sponsoring.

cheers!

On 9/10/22 08:29, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Gabriel Filion, 19.08.2022 00:53:56 -0400 |=-
>> I've created the package that's currently missing as a dependency to
>> the lib that I was trying to package.
>>
>> Could someone please review my work on the libobject-result-perl package?
>> I've created a salsa repository and pushed my work there with "dpt salsa
>> pushrepo"
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libobject-result-perl
>>
>> Note: I've also created this upstream bug report about the typo that lintian
>> found: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=144048
> 
> Hi.
> 
> My review discovered two possible glitches:
> 
>   1. Licensing mismatch
> 
>      debian/copyright says Artistic-2.0, while upstream sources say
>      "same as Perl". Perl is dual-licensed under Artistic or GPL. This
>      is even stated in perlartistic(1) :)
> 
>   2. Yet another typo
> 
>      Lintian reports one more typo - "LICENSE".
> 
> Otherwise the package looks good to me.
> 
> Cheers,
>      Damyan
>