Re: App::Session::Token

On 10/31/23 22:13, gregor herrmann wrote:
> You could have started a new thread, it's not that we we have a limit
> on threads on our mailing lists :)
>   

Haha good point -- I just saw your offer to help with Mikko's package 
and jumped at it. My mistake. :)

>> Actually I tried to figure out how to do the packaging myself a while ago,
>> but something wasn't working for me (a form URL was timing out IIRC) so I
>> gave up.
> Sounds, hm, interesting :)
>
> (We can't -- technically and by policy -- use online resources during
> build.)
>   

I don't recall exactly what the problem was (this was a few years ago). 
Maybe I was trying to sign up for some kind of ID or something (?).

> One thing I'm wondering is why App::Session::Token is distributed
> separately from Session::Token; no big deal for us to have Yet
> Another Package but putting a script into the distribution with the
> library seems to be quite common.
Yes, this could work too. Initially I thought to keep them separate, 
thinking some users of the library would not want to also install a 
script. And at this point, the library is pretty widely used so I'm 
hesitant to push a script onto all installations.

Cheers,

Doug