Re: Introduction And Request for Help
Mikko Johannes Koivunalho <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, When Env:Assert is packaged, will it become available to all supported Debians? When? Is there a repository for the packaging code? Thank you. Sincerely, Mikko Koivunalho On 01/11/2023 20:32, Mikko Johannes Koivunalho wrote: > > > On 01/11/2023 04:05, gregor herrmann wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:26:09 +0100, Mikko Koivunalho wrote: >> >>>> - If you want to get Env::Assert into Debian, the easiest way is to >>>> ask us to package it :) >>> Yes, please! >>> Thank you. >> Alright, let's take this route :) >> >>>> If it's the latter: I just spent 2 minutes with dh-make-perl and >>>> Env::Assert, and if I spend 5 minutes more, I can upload the package >>>> to the archive. [0] >>> Have I done everything right so the packaging is as easy as possible? >>> Just tell me if there is anything missing. >> I haven't noticed anything yesterday in my 2-minute-check but thanks >> for the offer! >> >>>> [0] Although I just realize that this might be better named envassert >>>> than libenv-assert-perl, as it's more about the binary than the >>>> library, right? >>> Yes, that’s right. In this case the library is mostly a bi-product, >>> not really meant to be used by itself. >> Ok, thanks for the confirmation. >>> Would it be better if Env::Assert was two separate (CPAN) packages, >>> one for lib and one for executable? >> I think that would be overkill. >> >> What I often see is that distributions like this are named App-foo on >> the CPAN, so maybe App-envassert would be an option. But from a >> Debian point of view that's irrelevant … > > I was thinking the Debian package could be called simply "env-assert". > > >> Cheers, >> gregor >> > > Sincerely, > Mikko Koivunalho > >