Re: some advices about packaging and orphaning on CPAN and debian
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:05:01PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: >> * are there docs to read and tools (or scaffold) to use when you want to >> package to CPAN the way people do in 2024? I remember about module-starter >> and distzilla, both had issues and Makefile.PL was good enough for me. > >I dug a bit into Perl documentation and found a lot of >information about building modules in perlnewmod(1)[1] and >perlmodstyle(1)[2] manual pages. The new module guide does >suggest to create a stub with module-starter, along with h2x >although comments in the documentation do not suggest this is >particularly modern. If you're after distributing your module >through .deb, you may also have a stab at dh-make-perl(1p)[3], >and why not maybe join the Debian Perl Team[4] to maintain them >officially in Debian. ;) > >[1]: https://perldoc.perl.org/perlnewmod >[2]: https://perldoc.perl.org/perlmodstyle >[3]: https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/dh-make-perl/dh-make-perl.1p.en.html >[4]: https://perl-team.pages.debian.net/ > One thing I still appreciate about the Perl ecosystem is the amount of documentation. Nowadays, I would start from the Task Kensho as a first (re)start. [5] https://metacpan.org/pod/Task::Kensho::ModuleDev >> * I'll move the projects from github and deal with patches and issues by >> mail. can we still use the PAUSE RT to do so ? (I'll update the documentations) > I find both git(hub/lab) and RT-based repositories running as backend for developers. It is definitely your choice. The first one allows running actions/tasks easily and that could be a big plus.