Re: MetaCPAN vs. uscan

gregor herrmann <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Jul 2025 11:44:50 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.perl
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 23:38:41 +0200, Xavier wrote:

>I think I can work on the uscan option.

Cool!

>Just tell me where to find the example.

You mean an example of a d/watch file where uscan gets the javascript 
"protection" from MetaCPAN? Well, that happens for all packages with 
https://metacpan.org in d/watch :)

(I used `uscan --report -vvv' in the ack package.)

>Nb: I'll be in Brest on Tuesday

Yay \o/


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
  .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
  : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
  `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
    `-
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 963 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=LjmL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----