Re: New packages for review

------------=_1762706586-10014-111
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 05 Nov 2025 23:52:44 +1300, Andrew Ruthven wrote:

>Thank you. I've fixed most of the things noted. There are some things like
>to hear further thoughts on, please see below (where I've deleted bullets,
>I've fixed them and nothing further to note).

>> > libobject-import-perl
>> > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libobject-import-
>> > perl
>>
>> * d/copyright: that's unusual:
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0 "??, Max Maischein <[email protected]>"
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0 :)
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0 and in general I only see Zsban Ambrus as a copyright holder
>
>Place holder where I was intending to dig further. Max doesn't appear to
>have exerted any copyright, so removed.
>Fixed. Pushed to Salsa.

Sounds good.

>> > libwww-mechanize-chrome-perl
>> > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libwww-mechanize-
>> > chrome-perl
>> > This one isn't ready for upload yet, there are two failing tests. I've
>> > created tickets upstream for them. However, the package can still be
>> > reviewed.
>
>Fixed. Pushed to Salsa.
>However I'm still working with upstream to get all the tests passing. I am
>reassured that the Fedora packager is having the same tests fail.

Makes sense.

>> > libselenium-remote-driver-perl
>> > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libselenium-remote-
>> > driver-perl
>> * lib/Selenium/Firefox/webdriver.xpi sounds interesting :)
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0 And looking into it is even more interesting, e.g. there's a
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0 Windows .dll in it =E2=80=A6
>Digging a bit into this, it is only used for Firefox < 48. So pretty much
>ancient history now. I'm thinking that I should repack the orig source to
>remove the xpi file. See
>https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libselenium-remote-dri=
ver-perl/-/blob/debian/latest/lib/Selenium/Firefox/Profile.pm?ref_type=3Dhe=
ads#L343
>.

Oh, nice if this file is not needed, and yes, repacking seems to be=20
the way to go.


Cheers,
gregor

--=20
  .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian=
.org
  : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 =
AA06
  `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Eu=
rope
    `-=20=20=20

------------=_1762706586-10014-111
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="signature.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Digital Signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=n9xf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------=_1762706586-10014-111--