Re: debian/watch and v5

Roland Rosenfeld <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Feb 2026 12:49:05 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.perl
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--m8Ip7PUUfJ9Tp3iF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 21 Feb 2026, gregor herrmann wrote:

> And I also noticed that version 5/the Metacpan template still has some ro=
ugh
> edges, so please, if someone converts a d/watch file, test it with `uscan
> --report --verbose` or similar afterwards.
>=20
> (The problems are around versions, e.g. having a leading v in the API, or
> the API responding with different versions than the tarballs have.)

I reported the issues with "v" prefix last year as
https://bugs.debian.org/1120062

Greetings
Roland

--m8Ip7PUUfJ9Tp3iF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=76Le
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--m8Ip7PUUfJ9Tp3iF--