Bug#1127616: developers-reference: should document using git-debpush to upload
Marc Haber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aYy09GeaL0rpc0Ty__29671.4557380014$1770829167$gmane$org@torres.zugschlus.de> |
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:15:40PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: >pristine-tar: With a new upstream version, tag2upload will generate a fresh orig tarball with git archive (via git-deborig). This is OK, but it may surprise some users. 1106071. I find that a problem for upstreams that don't releasa via signing tags. That is the majority of my packages. I think that having an .orig.tar.gz that hashes the same as the tarball relesed by upstream is vital for us. Just for the record: None of my packages require upstream repacking. >And with limitations, i'm sorry but then i'm not, I feel limited to use >different words (than the one you called accusation) for your *important* >bug request documenting and recommending tag2upload for *everyone* right >now, a week after it came out of beta. > >I surely have good faith in you (and Ian!) that you mean well, and also >that tag2upload will (and for some already is!) be super useful in the future. > >However, we are not there yet. So yes, I stand by what I ment. And yes, maybe >"propaganda stunt" is a bit too much, however I'm not sure you would have >liked "immature $something" much better. I fully agree and would like to add that the perisistence that tag2upload gets pushed slowly begins an urge to push back in my consiousness. Just to say it in German: "es nervt". Greetings Marc