Bug#1127616: developers-reference: should document using git-debpush to upload

Colin Watson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy
Message-ID <aYy_d25kL8dm4CR2__41707.2552650765$1770831814$gmane$org@riva.ucam.org>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 01:59:10PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>Holger Levsen <[email protected]> writes:
>> "Uploads to NEW (even if only binary-NEW), because for those ftp.d.o
>> currently demands maintainer-generated binaries."
>
>Why on earth are we accepting maintainer-generated binaries into the
>archive in 2026?
>
>Yes, I know several reasonable answers to that question, but they don't
>resolve the concern with maintainer-generated binaries.
>
>NEW uploads should be permitted to be source-only.

Just to be clear, I think this is a misinterpretation of the current 
state.  https://wiki.debian.org/ThrowAwayNewBinaries is implemented; we 
still require maintainer-generated binaries in that workflow so that the 
DFSG team can review the resulting layout, but that doesn't equate to 
"accepting maintainer-generated binaries into the archive" as part of 
the typical NEW workflow.

(Yes, there are other situations in which maintainer-generated binaries 
do get into unstable, although not testing, and non-main is still an 
issue.  But let's not conflate that with what normally happens when NEW 
is involved.)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.