Bug#1039979: /var/run and /var/lock should not be absolute symlinks

Santiago Vila <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy
Message-ID <aZhZVaXlnCifpltb__32108.644773119$1771592129$gmane$org@nuc>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 12:40:33PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 at 12:22:38 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > While we are at it, I wonder if we could actually deprecate those
> > locations for forky, and what would be the steps for doing so.
> 
> Which meaning of deprecated do you have in mind: the one where we discourage
> its use but it continues to work indefinitely, or the one where we plan to
> make it stop working? For /var/run, I think the first would be fine but the
> second would not.

I was actually thinking about actively encouraging everybody to do the
switch by dropping /var/run in unstable to see what breaks, but with
the intent of restoring it before forky becomes stable.

I believe we have done that sort of thing in the past (i.e. intentionally
breaking things in unstable in a reversible way), but I'm not sure if
this stragegy would be ok for /var/run at this point, or when it could be.

Thanks.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.