Bug#1135785: Suggest starting date-based version numbers with

Holger Levsen <[email protected]> Wed, 6 May 2026 10:30:54 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy
Message-ID <afsYXnP8b_h2W3YF__26129.7120990761$1778063609$gmane$org@layer-acht.org>
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 11:02:53AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> 0~date was already proposed 16 years ago by Russ in
> <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=186102#36>.
> then Russ cloned the bug as #589478 and reassigned it to devref but 
> nothing come of it, it is still open.
> 
> Maybe policy should suggest 0~date to avoid confusion.

or maybe someone just proposes a patch for dev-ref?! :)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

We live in a world where teenagers get more and more desperate trying to
convince adults to behave like grown ups.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=65CM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----