Bug#1135785: Suggest starting date-based version numbers with
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> Wed, 6 May 2026 10:30:54 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <afsYXnP8b_h2W3YF__26129.7120990761$1778063609$gmane$org@layer-acht.org> |
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 11:02:53AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > 0~date was already proposed 16 years ago by Russ in > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=186102#36>. > then Russ cloned the bug as #589478 and reassigned it to devref but > nothing come of it, it is still open. > > Maybe policy should suggest 0~date to avoid confusion. or maybe someone just proposes a patch for dev-ref?! :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ We live in a world where teenagers get more and more desperate trying to convince adults to behave like grown ups.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIyBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmn7GF4ACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhzutw/0Dyr8pELQCV7Tc92KviCCiV3uKnC5GYJ+YQp4JUXQAblaIsn2Is2GV+Z9 6nm0lmVWM3zkjrYh+Cl0L5dnOVxv2lbZ97d17XbiBn+9pK5a4gGX/hfffvY/tfQy aenfGHT7vkXSWA7PKP27abilboRaA2DKao4o7IFlN2zsfH1K0VfC0St/TOcgyQIp JWq9m9sTGXVRNhOtn2SVujCSWAA4Qt8wRjcEautFUJG9vuU9rqy1ZhW4Q1DkCAva uQb7R7Fdn8VmQrQMCPrB0JmJBQpvAsydLrHruBQ1yWlKLc0sXFt3frL0wiC8aSgh 9Ee0G7DEuTsUhyn50G8/gmqixR/vxFiIPqSJkHxV7LFoaGxrF14aXsyR/x3jbAHL 1fWjf+XtrHUSxmo6D4GXzFdkF5DAlepy4tv5a7sLedxFBCvaR5/dWMXZK2M7nvdn V8e7nK6V0VAPIi+gn+YwoLapEROLaRKqMHTYOGnzlQPIJZn15IEe/GVK8aIEzPCf NX/iDfRgK5WxKPC2jpu6diWj0ItGhxmTW+OT8nb7rgKu/KeDCaXVkYd0CAbyqqXi aYj5ptqNJgOZm/aa7QqVooS+271WZMstNua2dIRMrqDdc8imObGr3iiX5VpBMPFU 8V34DpmAic4CIspGKRDcvRdJWklJikMvCVhYtWhWlU3/sY28aQ== =65CM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----