Bug#1135785: Suggest starting date-based version numbers with 0.x
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> Thu, 7 May 2026 08:18:38 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <afxK3rMTg1ObdiMV__33796.6751701728$1778141968$gmane$org@layer-acht.org> |
reassign 589478 debian-policy forcemerge 1135785 589478 thanks On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 01:41:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Generally we want all the version number techniques to be in Policy. > Yes, I think that's a good counterargument to what I assume was my thought > process at the time that this was more advice than a requirement. > > I think this should be Policy advice, i.e. use "encouraged". > Yes, agreed. alright, reassigning and force merging accordingly. thanks! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Future generations will know that the decline of the American empire was engineered by the GOP.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmn8St4ACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhzHXg/+OjgPeYWCdouGIb5RTzhAzLUMtmrU1+JmllM0HdSwm7DdB1w/aHZC+mhC ClZxNVgKWUn+RLLPe2Cnkvk5fXFs/LdVzksL/gnYR/paxA3rqfT5uGRPqAsAykN6 oTKNB/QOioUtxVesQvuAceEN6t/osfpNhpCmOxG2HnoDzj+PQCjDKoRkXHPlfw2I CTVOixrADEV53oPIZgvtvHc0ZKqRFn9VdPZ+RwjO/vPAq/y0yaDwY2XtJT5Cc+1H WpbzyEWe1t9imdYY4N0p0MSSEdrMK+rZKfK7kyrpCPzfxdWNiHyQKcqVHA3mvJRg EARZd2pfwzja3Hsk/iQXKZurlFe0Fzd8G/mFN6eEp2SIH2bbX84snVpXfQMMby5m ehfLrh/QhwnJKT6UmmtnGA8QLBWVU5PvC9WctbNIHOdl/t0vVKShPJkoL34ZNG8V wjcs19131xRuJXsDMp0ebWEeXca3oNzf0GxqoixMsJDh4Xbf3en6aVhTiaFXXt8D tY2jAEaQsaJ14nLfqJO8UJ4iTtWHCiY28P2Dq0CuKib9qprIVjJKq++D3T/X5SPH jM4RHM9dln9hktGa6zFwE5u3VzEdVy96pQKB4BZwi8wsX8Q6/nhzzS6k5PXKUVHq JsCeT41cr5UOYjQzdAE4bL91p/eQgrk/ifQWVW1CNqDt7g85+2Y= =UcKV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----