Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Sat, 23 May 2026 11:46:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <87pl2m8ku6.fsf__49363.3238876768$1779533970$gmane$org@melete.silentflame.com> |
Nilesh Patra [22/May 7:58pm +0530] wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> As per discussion on the IRC, we are waiting for you to tell us which wording
> you'd prefer out of all the iterations.
>
> Could you let us know? Consider this a gentle nudge.
>
> [18:41:04] <helmut> feels more like policy editors needing a ping here in the sense that they might pick their preferred wording and we'd just second it
> [18:53:21] <guillem> ack, AFAIR the new wording seemed way better, but given that I'm not a native speaker (and the editors are) at this point of nitpicking/wordsmithing, that's what I'd rely on them for :)
> [19:51:54] <gargantua_kerr> I was under the impression that policy editors will pick it up after you folks second it...
> [19:52:18] <gargantua_kerr> I'll just relay this on the bug report
Thanks, I didn't realise this was waiting on us.
How about putting the 'should' first and the information later:
The ``Multi-Arch`` field should not be added to the binary package
sections for udebs because it does not apply to them.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmoRhYEZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQCUCD/0VCNS4B2d7zk8PUFjTgTkW 3Rv/TSgkQV8tQGjhtoSnz+RFBPAIQh4tjxPTEVpk68BCdbD0WW7WL/HF5szwurD8 Rg1eEyWmMIUojhFPjOwyVNlrLHVgQ1yMBkvzkVsJArIWUNjRmW3uK2hDR5c4VRHL L/py+Dj/RQYNE5mTC+16iA3aA2ZaQWv8qLFggBaVb0H2L7ibFDXoWez76nodIWVH 1QdhZaoFKTgv67JcnnQtcdfzCJORwIlACFY2EJUfxLjRDiH2yCFWa7RMMMh4W71e vsN/ZNw5qdIb6xYIeUTWPAOj8m7gQjR2n4YMmYBP1EdwYZVmdctmP6etmNQEAm7n FN9lxBOf/HcnydSYqDDKmVkZlSvltQBIi6e7odAQ9USU1bOnzUSRGBxVbJNlwQi9 NHd0K4hNU2fp/Hy4sDHz+1epS75N+9EqGNhaPn3uBWP7NET62FF3E0yQxmOeyTgg M9+Gw2teK6Pw3KAMttKviy4/v8/HZtM/IOMeTT6H+amOFSm2KNCvaFec4pAwhubK pD0TZqOR9lYOyx7qzIY1F1fxgdoWjBxQPj36mHisSp1Z425YT51zy6uhHvhaiIxi RFqdtJc3tw+IC0Xx7dtKSXPh29FWTgMmslWzBxvBwaFfeGiNTIuv4e31OERU82jF +0Q92Q+wS3ypGgwzYSV3JQ== =tnuS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----