Re: Bug#1137424: lintian/dev-ref: false positive embedded-javascript-library
Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> Sat, 23 May 2026 12:59:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <2350158.iZASKD2KPV@soren-desktop> |
--nextPart2038563.PYKUYFuaPT Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 12:59:47 -0700 Message-ID: <2350158.iZASKD2KPV@soren-desktop> Organization: Debian In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 On Saturday, May 23, 2026 12:49:39=E2=80=AFPM Mountain Standard Time Holger= Levsen=20 wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 08:28:14PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > 3.) should I override the lintian warning in dev-ref? > >=20 > > Please don't. Override should be reserved to pathological cases where a > > package is a policy exception, not to hide lintian false postive. >=20 > I disagree. (But I also think this is the least interest aspect of this b= ug > report.) When lintian has a false-positive that can be corrected in the logic of the= =20 lintian check, I usually file a lintian bug report and override the false=20 positive with a link to the bug report while I am waiting for it to be fixe= d. When lintian has a false-positive that is not possible for the lintian chec= k=20 to detect (there are lots of these, for example the tag very-long-line-leng= th- in-source-file) then I override the lintian false positive with an explanat= ion=20 of why it doesn=E2=80=99t apply. Checks like these are valuable lintian ta= gs because=20 they help me find problems in the source code, like minified JavaScript. B= ut=20 they can also flag files that aren=E2=80=99t problems, and it is important = to be able=20 to mark those as overridden after they have been manually reviewed. Note that this isn=E2=80=99t a comment on the best way to handle this situa= tion, just=20 a note that overriding lintian false-positives is indeed the correct behavi= or=20 in many cases. =2D-=20 Soren Stoutner [email protected] --nextPart2038563.PYKUYFuaPT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmoSBzMACgkQwufLJ66w tgMFDA//ajuLAk3hxrGpmF1gW3WIppSzFp4YsfVttlNpDnJqyPk2zQxmzEczixMQ oKHSlIjpKd5ODYI3g806zI6fART8kfZOR1ooLcBlLf2KWsTR9o2ctXwGmyTCkNkq t7kgyIWAazYr/ngll+TRUxqqZyuZV4EIQ0dx+XkaWGeTrrPNjmmWriWc+BIt5Vhv J7xrowqSnfgV47CTYbK0aaYIVVTFUO9cfj+Jbd/om2uc67WRV9twonZKI1cMseGp IIUWUgzKS3tWfppJhuE8dBXkzJDOytVucrZOyujh/0VU7GRG5d+5TaKemoalkgLc ZpgviP5HEopD7d+xNkqfnl1bBlz56NnXEUwjf5bqkvJIpCZX4koXjVijRs9eIzt4 PoSP7HlFvED/tSy3GyDo9P5C+fJFroAX1qJJygEZ++pU2NFbncJw7NY11VPeSH8O LRNuRuszgiSh5T6tM7tSN6SrGP3DtA6f2n1z7YTO3gVyudvgniFTzX9No8Og8VqR ORNNzCKXff4cVeN1SeWjbU7xZXhOBKg9VPQ8TCFk9S+loUETWXuV31oaJZFj8qjE c2tcujhgXJokdNq+fouNgS8Lae2+dg0Dub+q8ZOZYCy6hzgcMkmKSsyvFEPOr9V8 aMy5dWt6eKQR6ixpe3HOL7+IskjArwtFMtaWiWYIpwi+GPUOeLQ= =0Nh1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2038563.PYKUYFuaPT--