Bug#1140526: link in §2.2.1 to REJECT-FAQ is broken

Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:36:20 +0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy
Message-ID <ajj0BOcsn_zHZMRG__10683.2709208661$1782117568$gmane$org@belkar.wrar.name>
--V0RyIMuUCmo7rIfF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 09:59:05AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>=C2=A72.2.1 refers to REJECT-FAQ as the URI
>https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html but that link is broken.

(this link is in a footnote)

>Raising severity since Debian Policy seemingly at no place explicitly
>state that source packages must contain the source code that upstream
>prefer for their modification (as opposed to intermediate autogenerated
>data). Seemingly that requirement is deferred to that external URI
>which is now missing (probably since the split of the DFSG team).

Footnotes can't defer anything: "The footnotes present in this manual are=
=20
merely informative, and are not part of Debian policy itself." (=C2=A71.1)

Either the Policy should have specific DFSG interpretations explicitly,=20
whether "the project=E2=80=99s current working interpretation of the DFSG" =
as a=20
separate document exists or not, in which case it should be a separate bug=
=20
report, or it shouldn't, in which case the only bug report needed is to=20
fix/remove the footnote.

--=20
WBR, wRAR

--V0RyIMuUCmo7rIfF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEtf6ieDcfC1EgtGkao+OWn23e7IYFAmo49AQtFIAAAAAAFQAP
cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEKPjlp9t3uyG
4yMQAM3BF/yCSTU8nhbG0vrlKiKZ7CuzUIIZJLfC0b+4P+L8Qc+bQrTXyv6baGNT
TdAWc6M66Y1YRWAOxQbOez+X/gy1XLYb4sWqYGcgFoq40Dvj8NLu8Myi/cCclkSi
yuAWc7mF+SMoNQXvy2atIcLIfSjkcI7aA2z7zSMx0Q3g4DQl40xZxMg8NdhU/49I
Cj7f08XtrQqYUz1js4UYXcShYkUSkJU93ifb8X1tg6avPTKh78dmFNKTZ4s39hVl
wLGOgiyyIrYduhm5Ll0OXBPNqH9kjPJ1NheC/jZOT6iEGSTzt8WfIGaLDFkQiawD
TFd+PG7yZuvgEhzM8oSZq+dMCScSnpy14Oi2WNdjyug9n9h8vxnRx09cbUidgfW8
M0Fzo+3lOIcT8FOcUnHOV2aloVc7GtNwz+X6AXsn4zCf8gvAp3S8dXM4YC1WrDRn
bTl++IMDkprwzm7KqK3zuM3f3sysNqJvRvFoJffPZ5RCzJictpqatu+y5r6ijFfD
AhAS1+zTwvkrRnT6Sl9ByGZ7f8BJOohT6qcCOvSEcSjUQWvmNS/4TyfvB0zIHJL5
NeYtFSpy86g9/M4/1QmLHnaBmJxmwt6n3Tl1ZlolcG14l2+iffbkWprx9Ol/9CQI
Paz/Y25a606N0WqQ+COOg51vFYBlhuioYsTgKqa8NdflYHty
=Ho/R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--V0RyIMuUCmo7rIfF--