Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nilesh Patra [23/Jun 12:00am +0530] wrote:
> Wanted to bubble up this and wished to know where we are on this.
>
> Is there a consensus on the preferred wording finally?

Your patch has one second, from me, but needs another.

=2D-=20
Sean Whitton

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=1Gz7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--