Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nilesh Patra [23/Jun  8:25pm +0530] wrote:
> On 23/06/26 5:58 pm, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Nilesh Patra [23/Jun 12:00am +0530] wrote:
>>> Wanted to bubble up this and wished to know where we are on this.
>>>
>>> Is there a consensus on the preferred wording finally?
>>
>> Your patch has one second, from me, but needs another.
>
> There are 2 patches, Guillem seconded the other. Is the wording there
> acceptable to you?

I think the one I seconded is better.

=2D-=20
Sean Whitton

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=B2iY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--