Bug#1144046: define term 'release critical'?
Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <871pby2tdd.fsf__94.486160536178$1786880127$gmane$org@zephyr.silentflame.com> |
Simon Josefsson [16/Aug 1:30pm +02] wrote: > Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: > >> Well, Policy requirements define what's release critical in general > > Where/How? Adding the term 'release critical' to where the concept is > defined in Policy is what the bug report is about. You quoted the text where Policy requirements are defined. Basically, 'must' and 'should'. > If you prefer a footnote over my earlier patch, how about the attached > version? I think that we ought to make reference to the release team like I suggested. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmqBn84ZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQKklD/9pAvxDTIXhQ/WxbTXoyozM sF3XAqSVF0gSH/2j5Oj8tWNpXg0ggV6lMZumSCwy3gTHxDswHxJr0QC8d/niOjs7 iYpkQX+FSSf22qbXsWpo0gbsFVwDfc8n4swOaGduS3/ghJntuOtP2mH+0+W2Rg5c vMypjSUam/UM17b3WwUuIuny+OwPgZYjmlQROoyNflXC5f/zaAbHjMN0ozINOraF uO41TvM4i9S0Ll02D6NjAaEJrSSsbfm/sI7+zpHylvHvchsW/wqE1SfGGGVqkTFS Ktykb+OAt3ANkACL4k7ZsCcnkw+5KTx+Bx4XbgM4+EBHsIvp8RbceytYI/2l5TOU EvGijyObBPccjCAqcfthdn2nMCHtCO7+zv3w4pIWM7K8mtybZI+I8FCyGUTDiNSc 5TQ2KiaWqvoy0G3cExkgdS2hS/AXNP0bJDXt5rCMuaXsTU4Nz/2L0SawRKDrwTEm pK4eSGUraSbVuksFE4jBGrRSJ5U9Z5VR4bQ141igcIL3IZ5NOZ40AA7+3dyOc+aj sZfg89j6/drzq/7vjJm7UXlf8Dh9df5Gh9sjYHA9x3+uJprRf438sstd6JVRaV6i lXk3DUmJ7JtkbklbHiNl/Dgfqif+7B4K0LpP9BxI7DfDV3IWJXZXCYZCKid7Fi9u TRJmZ1THQ4ypJDiVeZeUIA== =HvR8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----