Re: duc: falha na construção em hurd-i386

Paulo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.portuguese
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Opa,

me deu mais um ótimo motivo para (re)fazer minha jaula hurd.

Estou preparando a jaula aqui e assim que tiver notícias aviso.

[]'s
kretcheu
:x


Em 02-04-2016 16:29, Herbert Fortes (hpfn) escreveu:
> Olá,
> 
> O pacote duc-1.4.1 falha na construção na hurd-i386.
> 
> Falei com o upstream sobre o assunto e ele
> tem uma sugestão para consertar o erro. Tenho agora
> que testar o conserto.
> 
> Mando para a experimental ? Como uma lib testando um
> arquivo .symbols. Ou é melhor alguém com acesso as 
> máquinas fazer o teste ?
> 
> O erro:
> ../../src/libduc/index.c:285:17: error: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> A explicação do upstream:
> "I see the problem.  GNU Hurd doesn't define PATH_MAX because they say
> the POSIX standard doesn't require it at all, and that we should
> instead be doing dynamic allocation."
> 
> A solução:
> "It might be just enough to change that to be DUC_PATH_MAX instead....
> can you try that simple change..."
> 
> DUC_PATH_MAX tem um '#define'
> 
> 
> abraço,
>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=InSh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.